Let me share with you a rather odd story regarding two of my
landlords who I have been speaking to this week. One has a 1 bedroom
apartment in Empress Court and called me to discuss his next investment.
He pointed to the Reliance Way devleopment in Cowley as a possible
location for investment. Later that week another of my clients who owns a
property in Reliance Way expressed and interest in securing a property
in Empress Court. 'What are the chances?!' I muttered to myself, but it
did get me thinking about these two giants of the lettings world and how
they compare. My findings were interesting.
My client paid £236,000 in 2011 for his 1 bed on Empress Court,
in Oxford city centre. At the time the rent was £1125 per calander month
which gave him a yield of 5.7%. Fast forward to present day and the
apartments are now going at £300,000 or more with the typical rent now
at £1250 per calendar month. His yield now sits at 5% and the property
has appreciated by 21.34%.
My landlord who owns a 2 bedroom apartment on Reliance Way,
Cowley purchased in 2011 for £249,950 commanding a rent of £1050 per
calendar month giving him a yield of 5%. Moving on to present day his
apartment would now fetch approximately £280,000 at a rent of £1200 per
calendar month with an annual yield at 5.1%. It's capital growth during
this time is 10.74%.
An argument could be made for both. They both command strong
yields and both show good sustainability but in this head to head, the
city centre prevails (just)!
If you would like any more information about these developments
or investment advice in general then please feel free to visit me in our
office at 31 Woodin's Way, Paradise Street, Oxford, OX1 1HD or please
give me a call.
Best regards
Richard
The new rules, which are set out in the EU Mortgage Credit Directive, set common standards that EU members need to meet in order to protect consumers taking out loans to buy a residential property.
The Government says the legislation includes “introducing a new set of regulations for buy-to-let lending, where the lending is to consumers rather than for business purposes.”
The Council of Mortgage Lenders says the rule change will have an “unintended impact” on buy-to-let lending and says it’s disappointed that the Treasury has found it necessary to make a “U-turn” on buy-to-let.
The CML offered the following explanation about which buy-to-let loans will be regulated:
“The Treasury considers that, to meet the requirements of the Directive, it is necessary to put a regulatory framework in place for those cases where borrowers are not making an active decision to acquire a property to become a landlord, and where they do not seem to be acting in a business capacity ("consumer" buy-to-let). Examples might include cases where the property has been inherited, or previously lived in by the borrower, but the borrower is unable to sell it and so lets it instead. The proposed new regulation will only apply to relevant new loans (not existing loans), and not until March 2016.”
The changes will not come into effect until March 2016, but the Government is consulting now in order to give mortgage firms and customers as long as possible to prepare for them. The consultation will run for eight weeks.
The advice from your property wizard is buy before this date!