In Oxford, like the rest of England, around
20% of all homes are now rented. A
recent survey of people showed a decrease in the proportion of young people
(under the age of 35) who own their own home, and separately another study
showed an increase in the number of people who don’t ever expect to own a home. Of greatest concern to first time buyers is
their ability to save for the deposit required under the new mortgage lending
rules.
So, what does this mean for Oxford’s
private rented sector? Firstly, growth
in demand in the City seems likely to be sustained over coming years. Whilst UK government policy is making life
financially harder for landlords, it reflects a recognition that the private
rented sector has become an important and permanent part of the urban housing landscape. As more and more people depend on private
rented homes for longer periods of their life, it has become important for
government to appeal to this group of voters by being seen to help them (e.g.
via a future ban on fees charged to tenants).
It has also become much more important that the private rented sector
can withstand a financial shock. Bearing
down on landlords with high levels of debt by increasing the cost of entry for
new investment (via the stamp duty surcharge), and increasing the cost of debt
(via the reduction of mortgage interest rate relief; and the introduction of
tougher loan to value ratios), should reduce the long-term volatility in the
sector. How? Well, in the short-term as
highly geared landlords choose to sell some or all of their portfolios volatility
looks set to increase. This may bear
down on property prices for a period, but as far as government is concerned
that’s OK – they welcome anything that reduces the cost of housing for owner
occupiers. Their calculation is that
over the longer term, professional landlord’s – private and corporate, will
fill the void, create a more robust private rented sector with long-term
investment strategies and with sustainable levels of debt.
In Oxford, it seems likely that the impact
of government policy will be felt more acutely because the entry cost of
property is relatively high, the average rental yield is relatively low and
landlord returns have been dependent on the capital appreciation of property
year on year. Because of that, rents in
Oxford have risen more slowly, as landlords recognized the need to ease the
rental cost for tenants during some tough years between 2008 and 2015, relying
instead on predictable capital growth.
Looking forward, I believe that a
significant trend in Oxford will be an increase in demand for rented family
homes. As tenants either choose not to
buy their own property, or feel unable to save for a deposit, they will spend
longer in the properties they occupy. As
their families grow they will look for different accommodation that better
suits their needs, and location will be determined by different factors such as
proximity to schools, access to commuter routes and child friendly open spaces. Oxford caters well for this maturing and
shifting demand. Places like Littlemore,
Greater Leys, Marston & Headington, Hinksey, Osney and Grandpont with their
terraced and semi-detached homes offer a wide choice of property for renting
families. Often, such properties have
been licensed as houses in multiple occupation by landlords, and whilst that
demand will continue, there will be growing demand for well presented,
modernized family homes in the City’s private rented sector.
In addition to demand for family homes, I
believe that there will be demand for longer tenancies and new models for
renting. I was alerted by a client and
blog reader this week to ‘rent to own’ models that have become established in
other markets, and which are gaining traction in the UK. These are long-term agreements between
landlords and their tenants, which provide the tenants with security of tenure,
and the option to buy at a date in the future.
The landlord benefits from long-term, stable income and an assured
future exit. As government policy
tightens, and investment returns reduce, landlords will demand stable, less
volatile income streams, over the longer periods of time. They will accept lower returns provided they
are predictable and stable. Tenants will
remain in the rented sector through extended stages of their lives, and will
also demand greater security of tenure, the ability to put down roots,
personalizing their homes to their needs.
We property professionals who work with,
support and guide our clients with their property investments, need to be ahead
of the curve to innovate and allows tenants and landlords to meet each other’s
needs by enabling new models to be introduced. Failure to innovate by
landlords, tenants and their agents will undermine the private rented market
over the coming 5 years.
In Oxford, like the rest of England, around
20% of all homes are now rented. A
recent survey of people showed a decrease in the proportion of young people
(under the age of 35) who own their own home, and separately another study
showed an increase in the number of people who don’t ever expect to own a home. Of greatest concern to first time buyers is
their ability to save for the deposit required under the new mortgage lending
rules.
So, what does this mean for Oxford’s
private rented sector? Firstly, growth
in demand in the City seems likely to be sustained over coming years. Whilst UK government policy is making life
financially harder for landlords, it reflects a recognition that the private
rented sector has become an important and permanent part of the urban housing landscape. As more and more people depend on private
rented homes for longer periods of their life, it has become important for
government to appeal to this group of voters by being seen to help them (e.g
via a future ban on fees charged to tenants).
It has also become much more important that the private rented sector
can withstand a financial shock. Bearing
down on landlords with high levels of debt by increasing the cost of entry for
new investment (via the stamp duty surcharge), and increasing the cost of debt
(via the reduction of mortgage interest rate relief; and the introduction of
tougher loan to value ratios), should reduce the long-term volatility in the
sector. How? Well, in the short-term as
highly geared landlords choose to sell some or all of their portfolios volatility
looks set to increase. This may bear
down on property prices for a period, but as far as government is concerned
that’s OK – they welcome anything that reduces the cost of housing for owner
occupiers. Their calculation is that
over the longer term, professional landlord’s – private and corporate, will
fill the void, create a more robust private rented sector with long-term
investment strategies and with sustainable levels of debt.
In Oxford, it seems likely that the impact
of government policy will be felt more acutely because the entry cost of
property is relatively high, the average rental yield is relatively low and
landlord returns have been dependent on the capital appreciation of property
year on year. Because of that, rents in
Oxford have risen more slowly, as landlords recognized the need to ease the
rental cost for tenants during some tough years between 2008 and 2015, relying
instead on predictable capital growth.
Looking forward, I believe that a
significant trend in Oxford will be an increase in demand for rented family
homes. As tenants either choose not to
buy their own property, or feel unable to save for a deposit, they will spend
longer in the properties they occupy. As
their families grow they will look for different accommodation that better
suits their needs, and location will be determined by different factors such as
proximity to schools, access to commuter routes and child friendly open spaces. Oxford caters well for this maturing and
shifting demand. Places like Littlemore,
Greater Leys, Marston & Headington, Hinksey, Osney and Grandpont with their
terraced and semi-detached homes offer a wide choice of property for renting
families. Often, such properties have
been licensed as houses in multiple occupation by landlords, and whilst that
demand will continue, there will be growing demand for well presented,
modernized family homes in the City’s private rented sector.
In addition to demand for family homes, I
believe that there will be demand for longer tenancies and new models for
renting. I was alerted by a client and
blog reader this week to ‘rent to own’ models that have become established in
other markets, and which are gaining traction in the UK. These are long-term agreements between
landlords and their tenants, which provide the tenants with security of tenure,
and the option to buy at a date in the future.
The landlord benefits from long-term, stable income and an assured
future exit. As government policy
tightens, and investment returns reduce, landlords will demand stable, less
volatile income streams, over the longer periods of time. They will accept lower returns provided they
are predictable and stable. Tenants will
remain in the rented sector through extended stages of their lives, and will
also demand greater security of tenure, the ability to put down roots,
personalizing their homes to their needs.
We property professionals who work with,
support and guide our clients with their property investments, need to be ahead
of the curve to innovate and allows tenants and landlords to meet each other’s
needs by enabling new models to be introduced. Failure to innovate by
landlords, tenants and their agents will undermine the private rented market
over the coming 5 years.