Oxford Property Market and Hammond’s Budget Promise to Build 300,000 more homes

I miss the good old days of George Osborne as Chancellor, with his hardhat and hi-vis jacket. He must have visited every new home building site in the UK with his trademark attire! For the last few years, the nearest Philip Hammond got to donning a ‘Bob the Builder’ outfit was at his grandchild’s birthday party. However, with what appears to be a change in focus by the Tories, they appear to have fallen in love with house building again with the Chancellor’s promise to create 300,000 new households in a year.

Nationally, the number of new homes created has topped 217,344 over the last year, the highest since the financial crash of 2007/8. Looking closer to home: in total there were 320 ‘net additional dwellings’ in the last 12 months in the Oxford City Council area, a respectable increase of 113% on the 2010 figure!  Evidence of a prolonged period of under-investment.

The figures show that 66% of this additional housing was new build properties. In total, there were 211 new dwellings built over the last year in Oxford. In addition, there were 43 additional dwellings created from converting commercial or office buildings into residential property and a further 81 dwellings were added as a result of converting houses into flats.

While these all added to the total housing stock in the Oxford area, there were 15 demolitions to take into account.

I was encouraged to see some of the new households in the Oxford area had come from a change of use. The planning laws were changed a few years back so that, in certain circumstances, owners of properties didn’t need planning permission to change office space in to residential use.

With the scarcity of building land available locally (or the builders being very slow to build on what they have, for fear of flooding the market), it was pleasing to see the number of developers that had redeveloped vacant office space into residential homes in the local council area. Converting offices and shops to residential use will be vital in helping to solve the Oxford housing crisis especially, as you can see on the graph, that the level of building has hardly been spectacular over the last seven years!

Now we have had the autumn budget, Theresa May and Philip Hammond have set out their stall with housing as their key focus, including more funding for the supply side and an injection of urgency into the planning system.

The biggest question is, just where are the Government going to build all these new houses? Whilst the apparent new focus on the housing market by the Government is good news for all homeowners and buy to let landlords, in the short term, demand still outstrips supply for owner-occupied and private rented homes and that will mean continued upward pressures on prices for buyers and on rents for tenants.

Tenant right to sue landlords

The Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government yesterday announced that it will support a Private Members Bill proposed by Karen Buck MP, which would enable tenants in England and Wales to take legal action against their landlord if their rental property is in poor condition. Secretary of State for Housing Sajid Javid MP has backed Homes (Fitness for Human Habitation and Liability of Housing Standards), which is expected to have its second reading on Friday. The bill states: that all landlords (both social and private sector) must ensure that their property is fit for human habitation at the beginning of the tenancy and throughout; and where a landlord fails to do so, the tenant has the right to take legal action in the courts for breach of contract on the grounds that the property is unfit for human habitation As part of attempts to drive out rogue landlords and raise property conditions, the government has already introduced a range of powers for local authorities. April 2018 will see both the introduction of a database of rogue landlords and property agents convicted of certain offences and banning orders for the most serious and prolific offenders. I believe that this future legislation is targeting genuine rogue landlords, however, landlords should keep an eye on how this develops.  There is already a discernible trend of tenants being more willing to complain, raising complaints with The Property Ombudsman, even where the causes of their complaint (often damp and mould related) is caused by condensation resulting from their own way of living.  Proactivity is the order of the day - provision of advice to rectify condensation, treat mould and manage ventilation and inspection to monitor its implementation is key.

Young proferssionals are unable to buy their first home in Oxford – Are the Baby Boomers and Landlords to Blame?

Talk to some Oxford 20 something, for whom home ownership appears a vague dream, and they are vexatious towards the Baby Boomer generation and their pushover walk through life, their free university education, their eye watering property windfalls, their golden final salary pensions and their free bus passes.

If you bought a property in Oxford for £25,000 in first quarter of 1977, today it would be worth £549,429, an increase of 2097.7%.

But to blame the 60 and 70 year olds of Oxford for that seems a little unfair. The mature generations joined the property party in the 1970’s and 1980’s when they were allowed to take out huge mortgages, protected by the knowledge that inflation would corrode the real value of the mortgage, increase property prices, while boosting wage growth enhancing their ability to repay.

Unlike Government, neither do I blame the multitude of Oxford buy to let landlords, buying up their 10th or 11th property to add to their buy to let portfolio. They too, merely reacted to the peculiar historic inducements of the UK property market.

Surely someone is to blame?

Margaret Thatcher and Nigel Lawson are also good people to blame - selling off millions of council houses at knock-down values and delaying ending of the MIRAS tax relief in 1987. The Blair/Brown combo doubled stamp duty in 1997 and again in 2000, which, as a tax on property transactions, precluding a more equitable distribution of current housing stock. And, our current Government has had plenty of opportunity to change the stamp duty rules to incentivise those mature Oxford house movers to downsize, but have failed to act.

It’s easy to think the only reason that hundreds of first time buyers have been priced out of the Oxford housing market is because of private landlords. Yet, I believe they are undervalued.  With first time buyers struggling to save for a deposit, if it weren’t for those landlords buying up homes we would have a bigger housing crisis than we have today. Since the global financial crisis of 2008/9, local councils have cut services, and haven’t had enough money to build new homes.  Homes that were provided to Oxford instead by buy to let landlords helping to reduce the scale of the current crisis.

657 homes are being bought by buy to let landlords each year in the Oxford City Council area when otherwise they might have been available to other buyers.  But at a time when the current national average deposit is £51,800, most young people are simply unable to meet lenders’ demands. And, homes bought by local landlords are not standing empty, instead they equate to 4,596 of homes for local people, most of whom either see renting as a preferred option given the flexibility required by the early years of their professional lives, or accept that they cannot yet meet lender demands for deposits.