Oxford Property Market and Hammond’s Budget Promise to Build 300,000 more homes

I miss the good old days of George Osborne as Chancellor, with his hardhat and hi-vis jacket. He must have visited every new home building site in the UK with his trademark attire! For the last few years, the nearest Philip Hammond got to donning a ‘Bob the Builder’ outfit was at his grandchild’s birthday party. However, with what appears to be a change in focus by the Tories, they appear to have fallen in love with house building again with the Chancellor’s promise to create 300,000 new households in a year.

Nationally, the number of new homes created has topped 217,344 over the last year, the highest since the financial crash of 2007/8. Looking closer to home: in total there were 320 ‘net additional dwellings’ in the last 12 months in the Oxford City Council area, a respectable increase of 113% on the 2010 figure!  Evidence of a prolonged period of under-investment.

The figures show that 66% of this additional housing was new build properties. In total, there were 211 new dwellings built over the last year in Oxford. In addition, there were 43 additional dwellings created from converting commercial or office buildings into residential property and a further 81 dwellings were added as a result of converting houses into flats.

While these all added to the total housing stock in the Oxford area, there were 15 demolitions to take into account.

I was encouraged to see some of the new households in the Oxford area had come from a change of use. The planning laws were changed a few years back so that, in certain circumstances, owners of properties didn’t need planning permission to change office space in to residential use.

With the scarcity of building land available locally (or the builders being very slow to build on what they have, for fear of flooding the market), it was pleasing to see the number of developers that had redeveloped vacant office space into residential homes in the local council area. Converting offices and shops to residential use will be vital in helping to solve the Oxford housing crisis especially, as you can see on the graph, that the level of building has hardly been spectacular over the last seven years!

Now we have had the autumn budget, Theresa May and Philip Hammond have set out their stall with housing as their key focus, including more funding for the supply side and an injection of urgency into the planning system.

The biggest question is, just where are the Government going to build all these new houses? Whilst the apparent new focus on the housing market by the Government is good news for all homeowners and buy to let landlords, in the short term, demand still outstrips supply for owner-occupied and private rented homes and that will mean continued upward pressures on prices for buyers and on rents for tenants.

County at 'tipping point' as nearly 200,000 people predicted to live in Oxfordshire by 2030

The following article is a cut and paste from the Oxford Times and is written by Georgina Campbell.  I've taken the unusual decision to re-post the article here as I feel it raises a number of interesting factors that show how housing policy (or lack thereof) is and will continue to hamper the Oxford's and the Counties future wealth.  I feel that Georgina has captured and presented some of the fundamental issues that our Civic and County leaders must address to ensure that the City remains the attractive, multi-talented, multi-cultural and vibrant Cities in the UK. Housing policy is not just a matter of building more affordable homes (although that is a critical component), it is also about recognising demographic shifts and providing suitable housing, enabling family homes to be freed-up for growing families by providing older residents suitable and attractive down-sizing options.

The article reads:

OXFORDSHIRE’s growing and ageing population is at 'tipping point' with nearly 200,000 extra people predicted in the county by 2030, public health bosses warn. 

The county’s director of public health, Dr Jonathan McWilliam, said the way services are run needs to change to prevent a crisis in people’s access to health and social care. 

Predictions for the next 15 years show the number of people over the age of 65 will increase by 53 per cent and those over the age of 85 will increase by 96 per cent. 

And although the fact that people are living longer 'should be shouted from the rooftops', Dr McWilliam hopes his independent report will be the catalyst for change in the provision of services. 

He said: "The biggest challenge is the increase in the number of people in the county and the number of people that will be here in the years to come. 

"This issue has been with us for the last decade. 

"The problem is this creeps up on us, it happens in slow motion and we do not take notice until we reach this tipping point where older services need to be replaced with new ones." 

The tenth annual public health report predicts an additional 183,900 residents will be in the county by 2030. 

And the challenge of managing a growing population is made even harder by a raft of other problems, he warns. 

Crippling house prices are affecting recruitment in health and social care - a problem which needs to be addressed to cope with the growing demand. 

Dr McWilliam said: "It is becoming increasingly difficult to recruit the staff we need to fill nursing, caring and ancillary posts. 

"In the last few weeks I attended meetings where the hospital and social care services were spelling this out very clearly. 

"Some hospital wards are for example reported to be running with 25 per cent vacancies." 

Oxford is the least affordable city with house prices being 16.7 times higher than annual earnings, on a par with London, and bosses warn they might need to look beyond the county to towns like High Wycombe to find enough affordable for housing for the influx of extra workers. 

Dr McWilliam added: “Other options such as building hostels for workers are also being explored. 

"We have identified the problem, we have reached a tipping point and we have to work together to find a solution, even if we do not know exactly what that solution is yet." 

Some developments for key worker housing have been proposed, such as 83 homes at William Morris Close in Temple Cowley (see more on the development in page 4), but many more would be needed to cope with the extra demand. 

Dr McWilliam is also calling for more joined-up thinking in housing developments, stating that the focus needs to be on how people can live a healthier life in their community. 

He added: "The key message is: health is planning and planning is health. 

"Of course every development is different, some are large and some are small. 

"But there are some basic principals in terms of dementia-friendly streets, cycle and pedestrian lanes that can be carried through all new developments." 

In order to tackle the 'whole raft of issues' Dr McWilliam is calling for central government, organisations and residents themselves to come together and work towards an overhaul in the way services are provided. 

He added: "We have never been in this situation before, which is why we do not have all the solutions to hand right away. 

"But I think we have time for organisations to find out what they need to do, we are recognising and reacting to that tipping point.

How is Oxford’s rental market changing?

In Oxford, like the rest of England, around 20% of all homes are now rented.  A recent survey of people showed a decrease in the proportion of young people (under the age of 35) who own their own home, and separately another study showed an increase in the number of people who don’t ever expect to own a home.  Of greatest concern to first time buyers is their ability to save for the deposit required under the new mortgage lending rules.

So, what does this mean for Oxford’s private rented sector?  Firstly, growth in demand in the City seems likely to be sustained over coming years.  Whilst UK government policy is making life financially harder for landlords, it reflects a recognition that the private rented sector has become an important and permanent part of the urban housing landscape.  As more and more people depend on private rented homes for longer periods of their life, it has become important for government to appeal to this group of voters by being seen to help them (e.g. via a future ban on fees charged to tenants).  It has also become much more important that the private rented sector can withstand a financial shock.  Bearing down on landlords with high levels of debt by increasing the cost of entry for new investment (via the stamp duty surcharge), and increasing the cost of debt (via the reduction of mortgage interest rate relief; and the introduction of tougher loan to value ratios), should reduce the long-term volatility in the sector.  How? Well, in the short-term as highly geared landlords choose to sell some or all of their portfolios volatility looks set to increase.  This may bear down on property prices for a period, but as far as government is concerned that’s OK – they welcome anything that reduces the cost of housing for owner occupiers.  Their calculation is that over the longer term, professional landlord’s – private and corporate, will fill the void, create a more robust private rented sector with long-term investment strategies and with sustainable levels of debt.

In Oxford, it seems likely that the impact of government policy will be felt more acutely because the entry cost of property is relatively high, the average rental yield is relatively low and landlord returns have been dependent on the capital appreciation of property year on year.  Because of that, rents in Oxford have risen more slowly, as landlords recognized the need to ease the rental cost for tenants during some tough years between 2008 and 2015, relying instead on predictable capital growth.

Looking forward, I believe that a significant trend in Oxford will be an increase in demand for rented family homes.  As tenants either choose not to buy their own property, or feel unable to save for a deposit, they will spend longer in the properties they occupy.  As their families grow they will look for different accommodation that better suits their needs, and location will be determined by different factors such as proximity to schools, access to commuter routes and child friendly open spaces.  Oxford caters well for this maturing and shifting demand.  Places like Littlemore, Greater Leys, Marston & Headington, Hinksey, Osney and Grandpont with their terraced and semi-detached homes offer a wide choice of property for renting families.  Often, such properties have been licensed as houses in multiple occupation by landlords, and whilst that demand will continue, there will be growing demand for well presented, modernized family homes in the City’s private rented sector.

In addition to demand for family homes, I believe that there will be demand for longer tenancies and new models for renting.  I was alerted by a client and blog reader this week to ‘rent to own’ models that have become established in other markets, and which are gaining traction in the UK.  These are long-term agreements between landlords and their tenants, which provide the tenants with security of tenure, and the option to buy at a date in the future.  The landlord benefits from long-term, stable income and an assured future exit.  As government policy tightens, and investment returns reduce, landlords will demand stable, less volatile income streams, over the longer periods of time.  They will accept lower returns provided they are predictable and stable.  Tenants will remain in the rented sector through extended stages of their lives, and will also demand greater security of tenure, the ability to put down roots, personalizing their homes to their needs. 

We property professionals who work with, support and guide our clients with their property investments, need to be ahead of the curve to innovate and allows tenants and landlords to meet each other’s needs by enabling new models to be introduced. Failure to innovate by landlords, tenants and their agents will undermine the private rented market over the coming 5 years.

In Oxford, like the rest of England, around 20% of all homes are now rented.  A recent survey of people showed a decrease in the proportion of young people (under the age of 35) who own their own home, and separately another study showed an increase in the number of people who don’t ever expect to own a home.  Of greatest concern to first time buyers is their ability to save for the deposit required under the new mortgage lending rules.

So, what does this mean for Oxford’s private rented sector?  Firstly, growth in demand in the City seems likely to be sustained over coming years.  Whilst UK government policy is making life financially harder for landlords, it reflects a recognition that the private rented sector has become an important and permanent part of the urban housing landscape.  As more and more people depend on private rented homes for longer periods of their life, it has become important for government to appeal to this group of voters by being seen to help them (e.g via a future ban on fees charged to tenants).  It has also become much more important that the private rented sector can withstand a financial shock.  Bearing down on landlords with high levels of debt by increasing the cost of entry for new investment (via the stamp duty surcharge), and increasing the cost of debt (via the reduction of mortgage interest rate relief; and the introduction of tougher loan to value ratios), should reduce the long-term volatility in the sector.  How? Well, in the short-term as highly geared landlords choose to sell some or all of their portfolios volatility looks set to increase.  This may bear down on property prices for a period, but as far as government is concerned that’s OK – they welcome anything that reduces the cost of housing for owner occupiers.  Their calculation is that over the longer term, professional landlord’s – private and corporate, will fill the void, create a more robust private rented sector with long-term investment strategies and with sustainable levels of debt.

In Oxford, it seems likely that the impact of government policy will be felt more acutely because the entry cost of property is relatively high, the average rental yield is relatively low and landlord returns have been dependent on the capital appreciation of property year on year.  Because of that, rents in Oxford have risen more slowly, as landlords recognized the need to ease the rental cost for tenants during some tough years between 2008 and 2015, relying instead on predictable capital growth.

Looking forward, I believe that a significant trend in Oxford will be an increase in demand for rented family homes.  As tenants either choose not to buy their own property, or feel unable to save for a deposit, they will spend longer in the properties they occupy.  As their families grow they will look for different accommodation that better suits their needs, and location will be determined by different factors such as proximity to schools, access to commuter routes and child friendly open spaces.  Oxford caters well for this maturing and shifting demand.  Places like Littlemore, Greater Leys, Marston & Headington, Hinksey, Osney and Grandpont with their terraced and semi-detached homes offer a wide choice of property for renting families.  Often, such properties have been licensed as houses in multiple occupation by landlords, and whilst that demand will continue, there will be growing demand for well presented, modernized family homes in the City’s private rented sector.

In addition to demand for family homes, I believe that there will be demand for longer tenancies and new models for renting.  I was alerted by a client and blog reader this week to ‘rent to own’ models that have become established in other markets, and which are gaining traction in the UK.  These are long-term agreements between landlords and their tenants, which provide the tenants with security of tenure, and the option to buy at a date in the future.  The landlord benefits from long-term, stable income and an assured future exit.  As government policy tightens, and investment returns reduce, landlords will demand stable, less volatile income streams, over the longer periods of time.  They will accept lower returns provided they are predictable and stable.  Tenants will remain in the rented sector through extended stages of their lives, and will also demand greater security of tenure, the ability to put down roots, personalizing their homes to their needs. 

We property professionals who work with, support and guide our clients with their property investments, need to be ahead of the curve to innovate and allows tenants and landlords to meet each other’s needs by enabling new models to be introduced. Failure to innovate by landlords, tenants and their agents will undermine the private rented market over the coming 5 years.